Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Thank google. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Thank google. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, July 26, 2007

Bupkis or Zilch?

Thank You Randy Rhodes.
And Senator Leahy, and The Washington Post

TSP? Terrorist Surveillance Program or something else?
Thanks Think Progress
The Swamp. Just about says it all, without reading at all. Thanks Chicago Tribune

My original google of "bupkis": beans
Googled without Snow.

With Snow:
Thank you Editor and Publisher

Old Beans.
For Tony Snow, bupkis is nothing new.

NOW...
[I was originally concerned with the usage of bupkis as Randi had noted as being Yiddish for "goat droppings". Not exactly what she said but it is not nothing. I thought maybe I didn't know beans about it, but thought it meant zilch.
Here I have closed a loop,
but had not made my point yet.

ATTENTION POWER BROKERS AND BRAKERS!
Congress MUST clarify the difference between what Tony Snow is dropping and what the Administration means by providing funding of zilch for such propaganda.

Meaning? All funding for press related offices should be cut, until the administration addresses congress's questions.]

[The only way that may happen anyway is by the process of impeachment, and several from the right are well ahead of too many that should be left.
Thom Hartmann has had three guests in the last week or so that believe it is not only the proper tool of inquiry, but the judgement if facts merit.
See MP3s here:
Bruce Fein Getting Ahead
Paul Craig Roberts Another Righty!* Bob Barr ]

*Impeach Now

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Read it and Weep.

President Obama's Speech(Video)
To quote* myself: I believe that this is the President I voted for and believed was the broker not brake pad for change.

[Or Scroll over]
Reuters (on using the Tax Code)
Lawrence O'Donnell
Thom Hartmann
NPR
Daily Kos
Tea Party Huffington Post Brookings Huffington Post
Grapes of Wrath?

* #not intended but paraphrased or edited
[I believe I may have understood instead, but then I recall the question: what did Jon Kyle intend? Did he not believe it or understand it was not a fact? And this was not to condescend or make lite of my lede, but it is about showing one's hand.

[In all fairness: Paul Ryan's Path to Prosperity (random google) and more perspectives NTBFD*.(Not to be fully digested.)]

Friday, Arpil 15th, 2011
Bold Progressives
Thank you Thom Hartmann: Reuters TVNEWSER/CBS
"Go at it!"

Monday, October 01, 2007

Kyl-Lieberman

1st I would like to thank Senator Cantwell for voting against the Kyl-Lieberman amendment and express my disappointment that Senator Murray supported it. While it is commendable that some things were removed...

2nd I would like to suggest the following interview (The president has accepted ethnic cleansing) be read in relation to this push on Iran.

But just as Hersh feels "that it has been underestimated how much the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) knows," I feel that Hersh has underestimated the intentions of the Administration, giving it a little too much altruism, when "return on success" explains it better. The problem is who is getting the return on this "heckuva success".

3rd: The urgency of this is easily dissipated by accepting that it is just politics and everyone doing as much as they can, but read the last paragraph from the interview and hope that we don't miss it again.

Meanwhile I had to get this out so that I could MoveOn.

[Update: 10-9-07 Wesley Clark supports vote for.
Hillary Exchange (similar to a recent Senator Murray exchange
Hillary statement
"Kyle-Lieberman amendment passed" spell corrected for google sake.]

Sunday, September 01, 2013